Enter the unsung hero of the AI revolution: prompt engineering, the art of choosing the right words to instruct Large Language Models
If you’ve ever sounded like a disgruntled manager yelling at an underperforming intern while prompting an LLM, you're not alone. However, modern LLM’s aren’t interns. They are PhD-level researchers with encyclopedic knowledge about the world and advanced reasoning abilities. Their “failures” often reveal more about our prompts than their capabilities.
Enter the unsung hero of the AI revolution — Prompt Engineering or the art of choosing the right words to instruct 200B+ parameter models. At its core, Prompt Engineering is about aligning human intent with machine understanding. These models don’t actually comprehend language — each word they generate in response to a prompt is chosen based on probability distributions learned from training data. Every prompt’s vocabulary, grammar and punctuation reshapes these probabilities. In this post, we’ll explore the principles of effective prompt engineering and how minor tweaks can induce significantly different responses.
Source: A Systematic Survey of Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models:
Vague prompts lead to vague answers. The more precise your instructions, the better the model can deliver what you need.
Bad Prompt: "Tell me about cooking pasta."
Good Prompt: "Write a beginner's guide to making pasta from scratch, including step-by-step instructions and common mistakes to avoid."
Give the AI enough information to understand the task's purpose and audience.
Bad Prompt: "What dog breed should I get?”
Good Prompt: "Recommend three dog breeds that are good for a small apartment in New York City, for a first-time owner who works from home and wants a low-shedding breed that doesn't require daily exercise."
Bad Prompt: "Suggest a thriller movie."
Good Prompt: "Can you suggest some thrilling movies with unexpected plot twists?
Example Movies: The Sixth Sense, The Prestige, Shutter Island”
Split big tasks into smaller, manageable steps.
Bad Prompt: "Write a business plan."
Good Prompt: "Help me create a business plan by:
Clearly define how you want the information presented, including structure, length, style, or specific requirements.
Bad Prompt: "Give me information about climate change."
Good Prompt: "Create a one-page summary about climate change, formatted with:
Bold headline
3 bullet points for key facts
A short paragraph of actionable recommendations
Include a quote from a climate scientist
Use no more than 300 words"
Allow the model to ask questions if needed, creating an interactive exchange that can refine the response.
Bad Prompt: "Write a bio for me as a software engineer."
Good Prompt: “Write a professional bio for me as a software engineer. If you need to clarify any skills or accomplishments, feel free to ask."
In “The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful?”, researchers started with a prompt and then wrote many variants, which all had the same meaning but differed in their sentence structure, word choice, tone, or mood. They were testing whether any of these linguistic properties had a large impact on prompt performance, and whether simpler sentence structures and word choices led to better performance.
They found we cannot reliably predict the result of minor edits to a prompt. For instance, changing the word “may” to “might” could lead to accuracy gains of over 10% on a task. Even though these were nearly identical sentences to a human, the LLM interpreted them very differently. Simpler sentence structures and wordings did not reliably lead to better performance either. This unpredictability highlights why effective prompt engineering relies on structured methodologies such as Chain-of-Thought reasoning, model alignment, and personality engineering.
Modern LLMs are powerful tools, however, working with them can feel like a game of chance. Prompt Engineering gives us a solid framework to guide AI responses, significantly improving how we communicate our needs. By following the principles outlined above and experimenting with different strategies, you'll be able to get a lot more out of these models and make your interactions feel more effective and intuitive.